- HOME
- Proposals/News
- Policy advocacy
- 【Public Consultation】Submission of Comments to the UK CMA’s Consultations on Proposed Steering Conduct Requirements for Apple’s and Google’s Mobile Platforms
【Public Consultation】Submission of Comments to the UK CMA’s Consultations on Proposed Steering Conduct Requirements for Apple’s and Google’s Mobile Platforms

On July 28, 2026, the Japan Association of New Economy (JANE) submitted written responses to two consultations conducted by the UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) regarding its draft Steering Conduct Requirements for Apple’s and Google’s mobile platforms.
【Background】
In October 2025, the CMA designated Apple’s and Google’s mobile platforms as having Strategic Market Status (SMS) under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act (DMCCA). On June 30, 2026, the CMA published its proposed Steering Conduct Requirements (Steering CRs) for Apple’s and Google’s mobile platforms, which would allow developers to ‘steer’ users from within apps to external purchasing and payment options. The proposed Steering CRs also include principles for fees imposed on steering to be “fair and reasonable,” as well as a prohibition on discriminatory treatment of developers who engage in steering.
JANE has consistently advocated for the establishment of a fair competitive environment in the mobile OS and app store markets, drawing on Japan’s experience in enacting the Mobile Software Competition Act (MSCA) and developing its implementing guidelines, as well as on the operation of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA). In these submissions, JANE argues that merely permitting steering in formal terms is insufficient to ensure effectiveness, and calls for modifications and clarifications to specific provisions of the draft requirements, based on the view that fee levels, screen design, reporting obligations, and anti-circumvention measures must be designed as an integrated whole.
【Summary of Comments】
■On the level of Steering Fees- The default should be zero.
Steering Fees charged in connection with Steered Transactions should in principle be zero. Even if some fee is permitted, it should be limited to the direct costs attributable to the services objectively necessary for that transaction, and fees above cost-based levels should not be justified on the basis of “value.” It should also be explicitly stated that all charges related to steering—regardless of name, timing, or basis—are to be assessed in the aggregate.
■On side-by-side display requirements for the designated firm’s app purchase system- Developers should not be required to display the designated firm’s app purchase system side by side with external purchasing options.
Developers should not be prevented from, at their own discretion, displaying the designated firm’s proprietary payment system side by side with external purchasing options. However, designated firms should not be permitted to require developers to display and maintain the firm’s proprietary payment system as a condition for steering.
■On the design of interstitial screens and user journey protection- Interstitial screens must use Neutral Languageand be shown only once; the entire user journey should be protected.
Interstitial screens displayed during transitions to external destinations must be strictly neutral in content and, once dismissed by the user, should in principle not be shown again for the same app. Expressions that evoke general concerns about safety or privacy, or that characterisethe destination as untrustworthy, must not be permitted. The scope of protection should extend not only to the formal placement of external links but to the entire user journey, including the destination, the path and process of navigation, session continuity, and the method of transition; a blanket prohibition on WebView should also not be permitted.
■On the prohibition of circumvention and outcome-based assessment of effectiveness- Circumvention must be explicitly prohibited and effectiveness assessedon the basis of actual outcomes.
Even individually limited measures can, in the aggregate, render steering economically and practically unviable. Charges imposed under different names, excessive reporting obligations, degradation of technical functionality, and indirect retaliation must be explicitly prohibited. Effectiveness should be assessedbased on actual outcomes—such as developer usage rates, the proportion of transactions completed externally, and the drop-off rate attributable to interstitial screens—and a mechanism should be established that enables prompt transition to more specific fee regulation where necessary.
JANE calls on the CMA to issue its final decisions within 2026 and to bring the Steering Conduct Requirements into effect promptly. JANE will continue to provide relevant information, including on the actual implementation of steering under Japan’s Mobile Software Competition Act.
※For the CMA’s consultations, please see here for the consultation on the Proposed Steering Conduct Requirement for Apple’s Mobile Platform, and here for the consultation on the Proposed Steering Conduct Requirement for Google’s Mobile Platform.
※For the full text of JANE’s submitted responses, please seehere.
